City Council — Hutto

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS].   WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS].   WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item 

Section 551.021 of the Texas Local Government Code provides as follows: <br style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; outline: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-alternates: inherit; font-variant-position: inherit; font-variant-emoji: inherit; font-weight: 400; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-he

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. &nbsp; WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this&nbsp;item&nbsp;

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. &nbsp; WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this&nbsp;item&nbsp;

The City Council, on or about July 10, 2025, approved the Public Improvement District Development Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between the City of Hutto and HWY 130 Mixed Use, LLC for the purpose of developing a mixed-use project consisting primarily of light industrial, multi-family, and commercial uses and all related improvements known as the Endeavor project. To facilitate annexation, as outlined in Section 4.04 of the Agreement, the following occurred: 1. Ordinance No. O-2025-049 (the "Original Ordinance"), dated November 6, 2025, was passed to annex the property. 2. Ordinance No. O-2025-054 (the "Correction Ordinance"), dated November 20, 2025, was passed to correct an administrative error in Ordinance No. O-2025-049. It was identified by staff that the Original Ordinance was never fully perfected in that Exhibit B, the Municipal Services Agreement, was not fully executed by both parties. Because of this, the passage of the Correction Ordinance was improper as the Original Ordinance had not been fully enacted under the law. This item shall properly execute the Municipal Services Agreement via Resolution approval and, in turn, facilitate the correlating Ordinance Item.

The City Council, on or about July 10, 2025, approved the Public Improvement District Development Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between the City of Hutto and HWY 130 Mixed Use, LLC for the purpose of developing a mixed-use project consisting primarily of light industrial, multi-family, and commercial uses and all related improvements known as the Endeavor project. To facilitate annexation, as outlined in Section 4.04 of the Agreement, the following occurred: 1. Ordinance No. O-2025-049 (the "Original Ordinance"), dated November 6, 2025, was passed to annex the property. 2. Ordinance No. O-2025-054 (the "Correction Ordinance"), dated November 20, 2025, was passed to correct an administrative error in Ordinance No. O-2025-049. It was identified by staff that the Original Ordinance was never fully perfected in that Exhibit B, the Municipal Services Agreement, was not fully executed by both parties. Because of this, the passage of the Correction Ordinance was improper as the Original Ordinance had not been fully enacted under the law. This Ordinance shall repeal and replace the Original Ordinance and the Correction Ordinance and replace it with an Ordinance that fully corrects any identified administrative errors and completes the Ordinance with all necessary documents required for perfection. Note: The current Exhibit B, Municipal Service Agreement ("MSA"), attached to this item is in draft form as the resolution to approve this document is under consideration early in the Consent section of this agenda. The MSA must be approved prior to this Ordinance being approved.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. &nbsp; WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this&nbsp;item&nbsp;

This item is regarding a cost-share Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the Hutto Independent School District (HISD) for the design and construction of a traffic signal associated with ongoing development in the area, including the new high school campus (“High School No. 2”). The additional campus is anticipated to generate increased vehicular traffic within the City. HISD has elected to take the lead on project delivery and proposes to manage the design and construction of the traffic signal improvements. As FM 1660 is under the jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the project will require coordination, permitting, and approval through TxDOT, which HISD would facilitate as part of project implementation. A Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis conducted by Dunaway Engineers, submitted to the City on February 6, 2026, evaluated the traffic impacts associated with development in the area. The analysis allocates responsibility for intersection improvements among HISD and other traffic-generating developments and establishes the City’s proportionate share of project costs. Under the proposed ILA, HISD will fund and construct the project upfront, and the City will reimburse HISD for its pro-rata share of eligible design, engineering, and construction costs. The City’s maximum contribution is identified in the submitted Traffic Impact Analysis, as 78.8% of the total eligible project costs, with a reimbursement amount not to exceed $306,256.59, as established in the agreement.

May 7, 2026 City Council Agenda: The proposed Change Order No. 3 as requested by Archer Western, the Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR), on this agenda as a credit in the amount of $40,870.00 to the Owner's Contingency for the equipment was previously noted in the Work Authorization #2 as a possible cost savings. Detailed below is a highlight of the information for each Project Change Initiative (PCI) as included in the corresponding work authorization for the proposed work items identified by the CMAR. In construction management, a Project Change Initiative (PCI) refers to formal efforts to manage scope, cost, or schedule changes, often using established frameworks like the 5 Ps (Purpose, People, Plan, Process, Proof) to control inevitable modifications, ensuring changes benefit the project rather than derailing it through clear processes, stakeholder buy-in (People), and defined goals (Purpose). Contingency Amount: Owner's Contingency Amount Prior to This Change Order $3,616,065.63 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order ($40,870.00) Revised Owner's Contingency Amount $3,656,935.63 City staff requests Council approval for the proposed Owner's Contingency deduction in the amount of $40,870.00. Backgrou

May 7, 2026 City Council Agenda: The proposed Change Order No. 7 as requested by Archer Western, the Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR), on this agenda as deducted in the amount of $217,191.71 to the Owner's Contingency for the equipment was previously noted in the Work Authorization #2. Detailed below is a highlight of the information for each Project Change Initiative (PCI) as included in the corresponding work authorization for the proposed work items identified by the CMAR. In construction management, a Project Change Initiative (PCI) refers to formal efforts to manage scope, cost, or schedule changes, often using established frameworks like the 5 Ps (Purpose, People, Plan, Process, Proof) to control inevitable modifications, ensuring changes benefit the project rather than derailing it through clear processes, stakeholder buy-in (People), and defined goals (Purpose). Contingency Amount: Owner's Contingency Amount Prior to This Change Order $3,656,935.63 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order ($217,191.71) Revised Owner's Contingency Amount $3,439,743.92 . Recommendation Approve the Resolution authorizing Owner Contingency Change Order No. 7 in the amount of <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Arial; font-size: 14p

May 7, 2026 City Council Agenda: The proposed Change Order No. 6, as requested by Archer Western, the Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR), on this agenda as deducted in the amount of $327,914.00 to the CMAR Contingency for items as unknowns previously noted in the Risk Registry for Work Authorizations #2, and #3. Detailed below is a highlight of the information for each Project Change Initiative (PCI) as included in the corresponding work authorization for the proposed work items identified by the CMAR. In construction management, a Project Change Initiative (PCI) refers to formal efforts to manage scope, cost, or schedule changes, often using established frameworks like the 5 Ps (Purpose, People, Plan, Process, Proof) to control inevitable modifications, ensuring changes benefit the project rather than derailing it through clear processes, stakeholder buy-in (People), and defined goals (Purpose). Contingency Amount: CMAR Contingency Amount Prior to This Change Order $4,124,879.87 Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order $327,914.00 Revised CMAR Contingency Amount $3,796,965.87 Recommendation Approve the Resolution authorizing CMAR Contingency Request No. 3 in the amount of $327,914 for the SWWTP Expansion project, resulting in a net decrease to the CMAR contingency with no change to the overall contract price. Background In January 2023, the City Council awarded the contr

Highlights of the City's cash and investment activity for the quarter ending March 31, 2026 include the following: The City's total cash balance of $339,058,593 is reflected on page 6. Of this amount, $306,117,362 is restricted, and $32,941,231 is unrestricted. The total cash balance of $339,058,593 reflects a net increase of $68,128,162 from the December 31, 2025 report. The most notable cash events this quarter were the sale of $5 million in general obligation bonds for the design of the Justice Center, as well as the sale of $72.5 million in certificates of obligation for wastewater projects. These sales resulted in net cash increases in the GO Bond funds and Utility CIP funds, despite draw downs for payments of CIP projects. Cash in the general fund and general I&S fund also increased by $8 million and $4.1 million respectively, due to the collection of property taxes in January and February. During the quarter, two CD's matured for proceeds of about $31.5 million. A portion of those proceeds, in addition to proceeds from the 2026 bond issuance, were invested into five CD's, with maturities ranging from 3 months to 1 year. The City needs approximately $25 million in cash per month to satisfy obligations related to CIP projects, payroll, and other goods and services. The City currently maintains a balance of $15-35 million in its Wells Fargo sweep account to ensure that weekly obligations are met. The weekly cash need varies significantly based on the timing of CIP payments. The advantage of keeping funds in a sweep account is that the account earns interest at over 3.7%, while automatically sending money to the City's primary depository account as funds are needed. The balances in the Wells Fargo sweep accounts are reviewed weekly, and replenished by the local government investment pools. In summary, the majority of the City's investment portfolio is invested in securities and certificates of deposit at

BACKGROUND INFORMATION In response to recent changes to the City's contract with the Manville Water Supply Corporation, staff is bringing forward an amendment to the adopted fee schedule to reflect the contract change. Manville has increased its fee for disconnecting customers for non-payment from $50.00 to $100.00, effective March 24, 2026. Because the City passes this third-party charge through directly to affected Manville customers, staff recommends that the fee schedule be updated to reflect the new rate. In addition, staff is removing the reference to Jonah Water Supply Corporation from the description of this fee. The City does not assess a processing fee to Jonah customers for disconnection; the prior language was included for informational purposes but has been removed to avoid confusion. Summary of Fee Schedule Changes (in Section Order) Other Service Charges (A5.003) Updated the processing fee for disconnection of service for non-payment: Manville customers will continue to be assessed the $50.00 City processing fee plus an additional disconnect fee charged by Manville, which has increased from $50.00 to $100.00. Removed reference to Jonah Water Supply Corporation from the fee description, as the City does not charge Jonah customers a processing fee for disconnection.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This request aligns with Pillar 4 Create the Highest Quality of Life and Objective 4D Enhance parks and recreation by expanding green spaces, improving amenities, and ensuring well-maintained, inclusive facilities for all Hutto residents. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On October 2, 2025, City Council approved Resolution No. R-2025-293 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Facilities Utilization Agreement for the term of January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, authorizing Sting Soccer's use of City public facilities for youth sports and recreational programming. Sting Soccer Foundation is currently in the process of merging with FC Westlake Soccer, a well-established and highly regarded youth soccer organization in Central Texas. As a result of this merger, Sting Soccer is seeking to assign its rights, title, and interest under the Agreement to the successor entity, which would then assume operational responsibility for use of the City's fields. The original Agreement does not contain a provision addressing assignment. This First Amendment adds paragraph 26 to the Agreement, establishing that the Foundation may not assign or sublet its rights under the Agreement without prior written consent from the City, and that any unauthorized assignment shall be void. FC Westlake Soccer is an established and well-regarded youth soccer provider throughout the Central Texas region. The City of Hutto anticipates that this partnership will bring expanded opportunities and a high standard of play to Hutto's soccer community. REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the First Amendment.

The proposed South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) Lift Station improvements consists of change of conditions caused by the location of the 66-Inch Fiber-reinforced pipe (FRP) Influent Pipeline being farther away than the location indicated in the Contract Documents. On Drawing 01C-02, the callout states “Connect Prop 9 LF of 66” FRP Pipe to existing 66” FRP interceptor via tunneling. The coordinates provided for the location of the tie-in to the 66” FRP Interceptor were N:1018218.21 E:3181228.82. The actual coordinates for the Interceptor are N:10158220.18 E:31228.76. This difference required approximately 14 Linear Feet (LF) total of 66-Inch FRP Pipe and 3 LF of additional tunneling beyond what was indicated by the Contract Documents. This additional tunneling and pipe installation directly delayed the critical path schedule of the project by 5 Calendar Days.

Background On November 7, 2024 City Council approved a Master Services agreement with Freese and Nichols as a Utility Engineering Rotation List consultant. The City of Hutto (City) owns and operates two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs): the Central WWTP (CWWTP), and the South WWTP. The 2022 Wastewater Master Plan Report (WWMP), dated December 2, 2022 (prepared by others) recommended expansion increments for the CWWTP facility of 1.7 MGD and an ultimate capacity of 3.25 MGD Annual Average Daily Flow (AADF). The City’s existing Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit, issued October 15, 2020 includes the phases recommended in the WWMP. The City desires to make phase 1 improvements to the CWWTP to expand the treatment capacity from 0.99 MGD to 1.70 MGD. The CWWTP currently operates in a conventional activated sludge process with common wall construction. Based on the recommendation as noted in the 2022 WWMP (prepared by others), the City plans implement upgrades to the CWWTP process to a membrane bioreactor (MBR) configuration, minimizing the need for additional facility construction as plant capacity grows, however this scope is to divert the flows to the South Wastewater Treatment Plant. As part of the proposed Preliminary Engineering Report design contract, FNI will validate the WWMP recommendation. Supplemental Request The requested action is for the approval of an amendment to the professional services agreement with Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) for the Central to South Wastewater Line component of the Hutto Central Wastewater Treatment Plant (CWWTP) Expansion Project. The ame

The proposed Glenwood Interceptor and Lift Station improvements consist of 1) quantity adjustments to line items 13 and 44 and 2) additional labor and material due to changes issued in Field Order No.3 Additional time due to delays caused by Oncor. Description of the proposed Change: Item No. 13: Furnish and install 60-inch steel casing pipe by bore and jack Line Item No. 13 increased by 20 linear feet via RFI #6 and 20 linear feet via RFI #7. This will increase the line Item by a total of 40 linear feet at $2,175.00 per linear feet for a total additional cost of $87,000.00. Item No. 44: Furnish and install restrained 20-inch ductile iron force main via open cut. Line Item No. 44 does not match what was installed the field via RFI #17. 435 linear feet was installed in the field. This line item needs to be increased by 68 linear feet at $601.00 per linear feet for a total additional cost of $40,868.00.

Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. ("Pulte") owns +/- 31.55 acres of land located entirely within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Round Rock ("Round Rock") and within the City of Hutto's ("Hutto") wastewater Certificate of Convenience and Necessity ("CCN"). Pulte desires to obtain wastewater service from Round Rock. Hutto and Round Rock have agreed to amend their perspective wastewater CCNs to allow Round Rock to serve the tract, provided that Pulte compensates Hutto for the release of the tract. This Compensation Agreement facilitates the provision of payment from Pulte to Hutto in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per Living Unit Equivalent for each single-family residential lot to be developed. Currently, the fees estimated to be collected under the Compensation Agreement account for ninety-two (92) Living Unit Equivalents to total forty-six thousand dollars ($46,000.00). This amount remains subject to the final development of the property and the correlating final Living Unit Equivalent count.

Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. ("Pulte") owns +/- 31.55 acres of land located entirely within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Round Rock ("Round Rock") and within the City of Hutto's ("Hutto") wastewater Certificate of Convenience and Necessity ("CCN"). Pulte desires to obtain wastewater service from Round Rock. Hutto and Round Rock have agreed to amend their perspective wastewater CCNs to allow Round Rock to serve the tract, provided that Pulte compensates Hutto for the release of the tract. This Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement") ensures that Round Rock shall not issue building permits to Pulte unless and until proof that provision of payment under the Compensation Agreement by and between Pulte and Hutto is provided. Upon approval by the Hutto City Council, this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement will be considered for action by the Round Rock City Council. To date, the contents of the Agreement have been approved by both parties.

Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P. ("Pulte") owns +/- 31.55 acres of land ("Transfer Area") located entirely within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Round Rock ("Round Rock") and within the City of Hutto's ("Hutto") wastewater Certificate of Convenience and Necessity ("CCN"). Pulte desires to obtain wastewater service from Round Rock. Hutto and Round Rock have agreed to amend their perspective wastewater CCNs to allow Round Rock to serve the tract, provided that Pulte compensates Hutto for the release of the tract. This Service Area Agreement (the "Agreement") ensures that the Round Rock shall provide sewer utility service to the Transfer Area following Pulte's provision of compensation to the City of Hutto in accordance with the separately executed Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. Upon approval by the Hutto City Council, this Service Area Agreement will be considered for action by the Round Rock City Council. To date, the contents of the Agreement have been approved by both parties.

The South Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project (CIP WW06-2023) includes significant structural and site improvements requiring construction materials testing (CMT) and observation services to ensure compliance with project specifications and applicable standards. The City previously executed a professional services agreement with Raba Kistner to provide these services based on the anticipated scope and construction schedule at the time of design. As construction has progressed, the demand for materials testing and inspection services has exceeded original estimates. Specifically: Increased Concrete Testing: The project has required substantially more concrete placement testing than originally anticipated, resulting in a higher volume of testing, sampling, and reporting. Extended Pour Durations: Concrete pours have taken longer and occurred more frequently than initially planned, requiring extended technician time on-site to maintain compliance with testing protocols and quality assurance standards. Concurrent Construction Activities: Multiple structures and work areas have been under construction simultaneously. This created a need for multiple technicians (typically 2–3 at a time) to adequately observe and test compaction densities and other materials across different locations.</

This project is located in the southeast section of Hutto and consists of infrastructure acceptance of street, sidewalk, water and wastewater construction in Carmel Creek Amenity Center. The final inspection by staff accepts this infrastructure, including supporting documentation. Infrastructure documents include maintenance bonds, cost summary, areas approved and itemized infrastructure.

The proposed Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Lift Station No. 2 project improves material costs for an additional Air Release Valve (ARV) to be added to the main form, along with two additional spool pieces with adjusted lengths. Minimal labor is required. Costs are a result of Field Order #4 issued by DCS. On August 15, 2024, the City Council authorized the award of a contract to Cash Construction Company, Inc for the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Lift Station Project in the amount of $4,763,551.00. Agenda Request: The proposed agenda item is a request for City Council approval for change order no. 2 associated with Change Proposal Request (CPR) No. 2 and No. 3, per Field Order No. 4 issued by DCS. The proposed change order number 2 is for the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant Lift Station No. 2 project and consists of three items: Item 1: CPR No. 2 — costs associated with additional Air Release Valve (ARV) added. $22,877.61, 0 days Item 2: CPR No. 3 — additional time and cost associated with pump submittal coordination and manufacturing supply delays. $79,698.34, 159 days.<span style="background-color: rgb(24

On January 19, 2023 the City Council authorized the award of a construction contract to C.C. Carlton Industries for the Shiloh and Noack Pump Station Improvements in the amount of $9,481,121.50. The Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued on January 26, 2023. The proposed agenda item is a request for City Council approval for change order no. 6 associated with Change Proposal Requests (CPR) No.4, No.5 and No. 6 for Shiloh and Noack Pump Station Improvements. The previous five (5) change orders have totaled eighteen (18) additional days and $158,227.96. The proposed change order number 6 is for Shiloh and Noak Pump Station Improvements project and consists of three items. The first item is CPR NO. 4 associated with a credit for the installation of a new 6-inch chain link fence with barbed wire at the Shiloh Pump Station. This first item includes a deduction of $24,650.00 from the contract price and includes no time added. The second item is a make-up pump model revision per Change Proposal Request (CPR) No. 5, Request For Information (RFI) No.19. This item adds $13.829.15 to the contract price and adds 87 days to the contract time. The third and final item in Change Order #6 is a Chlorine Booster Pump installation per CPR No. 6, RFI No. 23. The third item adds $19,128.17 to the overall contract price and adds no time. Overall, Change Order #6 as proposed results in an increase of $8,307.32 from the overall contract price, while adding 87 additional days to the contract time.

On July 10, 2025, City Council previously approved an Individual Project Order (IPO) with MWM Design Group to initiate the professional engineering services for the Hutto Lake Park Playground project. The Notice to Proceed (NTP) for MWM Design Group to begin work being issued on July 28, 2025. On March 5, 2026, City Council approved an agreement with Fund Abounds, Inc. for the purchase and installation of playground equipment. Also at the March 5 meeting, City Council approved Change Order #1 with MWM Design Group to add 113 business days to their schedule, reconciling conflicting schedules found in the original IPO and NTP. Following this change order, MWM Design Group's anticipated timeline included the evaluation of bids and recommendation of award on April 10, 2026, and the construction phase ending in August 2026. The purpose of this item is to approve a resolution for a contract to be awarded to Synergy Commercial Construction for the construction of the Hutto Lake Park Playground project. The City utilized the competitive seal proposal method for selection of a general contractor, in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Chapter 2269, Subchapter D, Section 2269.151, which is a process requiring submission of written technical and price proposals from one or more offerors and a written evaluation of each proposal in accordance with evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation. MWM Design Group recommends that a construction contract be awarded to Synergy Commercial Construction, of Georgetown, TX, in the amount of $170,351.76 for the Hutto Lake Park Playground project. Pre-Bid Meeting: March 18, 2026 Bid Opening: April 8, 2026 Eleven (11) bids were received, and ranked in relation to unit bid pricing. Ranking of General Contractors 1. RCITX, LLC: $148,167.60 2. Synergy Commercial Construction: $170,351.76 3. SYNTH Construction: $188,

Annually, the Planning & Zoning Commission receives testimony from the City Engineer and guidance from other department heads such as parks, finance, and public works at multiple, serial meetings for the creation and on-going maintenance of the city's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. The plan is a matrix of proposed projects that are listed within fiscal years by urgency and the availability of funding. The city's website describes the plan: "Capital projects are intended to address the City of Hutto's infrastructure needs, both current and future. Projects fall into six main areas: Transportation, Water, Wastewater, Parks & Recreation, Drainage, and Municipal Facilities." The product of these meetings presents an opportunity for the Commission to receive education and background data, so that a recommendation for the following year's annual update can be presented to the City Council.

WMV Hutto 390 DE, LLC ("Owner") owns three hundred and seventy-two (+/- 372) acres of land located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Hutto (the "Property"). Owner intends to develop the Property in accordance with a Planned Unit Development approved via Ordinance No. O-2025-039 consisting of ninety percent (90%) residential use and ten percent (10%) commercial use. On or about June 3, 2025, Owner submitted a petition for the creation of the Stromberg Public Improvement District (the "District") over the property to finance the acquisition, construction, and/or improvement of certain public improvements that provide a special benefit to the District and the community. This Stromberg Public Improvement District Financing Agreement shall govern the public improvement district funding terms and conditions which include, but are not limited to, the Tax Equivalent Rate of the Annual Installments, the Authorized Improvements within the District, the sequential phasing or series of bonds, and the reimbursement of actual costs of the Authorized Improvements from the proceeds of the bonds. *It should be noted that this item was discussed in Executive Session at the Thursday, April 16th Council meeting.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item

The proposed agenda item is a request for City Council approval of a Change Order for a decreased cost in the amount of $5,822.25 and contract time of 9 additional days for the Fritz Park Phase II Project. Agenda Request: The proposed change order is for the modifications to the original project scope that have resulted in the need for changes detailed in Change Order #04, dated April 2, 2026. The change order reflects a total decrease of $5,822.25, which will be applied to the project’s Contract Allowance and remains within the overall Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). Change Order #04 includes one item (Change Proposal 004) for additional electrical work at the Well House. The work consisted of replacing a 60‑amp breaker with a 100‑amp two‑pole breaker, installing conduit and two 60‑amp disconnects, and adding two additional 50‑amp two‑pole circuit breakers. The design team evaluated multiple approaches to accommodate increased electrical loads and determined that this solution is the most efficient and cost‑effective method to allow both the supply pump and irrigation pump to operate simultaneously. A review of the project budget confirms that sufficient funds remain in the Project Allowance, which currently has a balance of $9,369.00. The proposed changes will also require an extension of nine calendar days to the contract time.

This proposed amendment addresses the revenues of the Hutto Economic Development Corporation (HEDC), expenditures of River Creek Development Corporation, and expenditures Utility Fund of the City as follows: Economic Development Corporation This proposed amendment was presented to and approved by the HEDC board at their April 13, 2026 board meeting. This amendment will place the budgeted sales tax incentive payments into its own line item. Currently, the budgeted incentive payments are lumped into the same account as gross sales tax receipts. The amount of budgeted sales tax incentive payments for this fiscal year is $230,250. Because this is a reclassifying budget amendment, this amendment has no effect on fund balance. River Creek Development Corporation This proposed amendment increases budgeted attorney services and trustee agent fees of the River Creek Development Corporation. The current budget is not adequate to meet the obligations due to current litigation involving the Corporation. This was not included in the mid-year budget amendments due to the timing of recent invoices received. The proposed amendment will increase the contractual services line items by $81,606, leaving a fund balance of $3,937,836. Utility Fund This proposed amendment increases budgeted attorney service of the Utility Fund by $45,797. This increase is the result of legal fees for various water reservation agreements and contracts. This will leave a budgeted fund balance of $13,668,094.

This item reflects the assignment and assumption of groundwater operating and transport permits issued by the Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District from Heart of Texas Suppliers, L.P. to the City of Hutto, Texas. The agreement transfers all rights, titles, and obligations associated with the permitted wells and water transport, allowing the City to operate the wells and utilize the groundwater for municipal purposes in accordance with district rules and applicable regulations. This expenditure is being brought forward to City Council for approval due to the cost paid to them throughout the fiscal year. Council must approve cumulative expenditures to a single vendor over $50,000. These expenditures are typically approved by Council with the annual blanket purchase order ordinance. The expenditures for this vendor and line item were omitted from the current year’s ordinance, as this is the first year that payments to this vendor exceed the $50,000 threshold. There is now an adequate budget for approval of this line item; the budget amendment was approved by Council at the April 2nd meeting.

The current Junk Vehicle ordinance has not been updated since 2007, and research revealed that neither the city ordinance nor state law provided a clear definition of what constitutes an inoperative vehicle. This revised ordinance addresses this gap by modernizing and clarifying the entire regulatory framework. Over the course of more than a year, the Department collaborated closely with the City’s legal team and Municipal Court prosecutor to ensure the ordinance is both enforceable and provides appropriate due process protections for vehicle owners.Cities rely on junk and abandoned vehicle ordinances to safeguard public safety, preserve community appearance, and prevent environmental harm. Inoperable or abandoned vehicles can leak hazardous fluids, attract pests, and create fire or traffic hazards, particularly in residential areas. They also contribute to neighborhood decline by creating the appearance of neglect, which can reduce property values and deter investment. Furthermore, such vehicles are often targets for vandalism or other illegal activity. By establishing clear authority to regulate, remove, and properly dispose of these vehicles, the ordinance helps maintain clean, safe, and livable neighborhoods for all residents. This ordinance defines and regulates abandoned, inoperable, and junked vehicles within the City of Hutto, especially on public roadways and rights-of-way. It outlines what qualifies as an inoperable or junked vehicle, including vehicles with expired registration, missing plates, visible damage, or those left unattended for extended periods (over 72 hours in public areas or 30 days on private property). The law prohibits keeping junked vehicles visible from public view and bans covering vehicles on public roads in a way that hides identifying features. Such vehicles are considered public nuisances because t

On November 6, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. R-2025-327 of the City of Hutto, Texas, accepting a petition and calling for a public hearing on the creation of the Stromberg Public improvement District (the “PID”) within the City of Hutto, Texas. Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for the creation of a public improvement district after notice of such hearing is published in the newspaper and mailed to the property owners. The notice in the newspaper appeared on November 16, 2025, and the letter notifying the property owners was mailed on November 18, 2025. with such hearing being opened on December 4, 2025 and continued until being closed on January 22,, 2026. This Resolution, if approved, would create the Stromberg Public Improvement District. There are two versions of the Resolution creating this PID in the Agenda Packet and a choice for City Council to consider regarding the allocation of development within the PID between residential and commercial. Currently, the Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “PUD”) and the Financing Agreement associated with this PID both require an approximate 90% residential development and 10% commercial development for land within the PID. To change either of these would require future approval by City Council and in the case of the PUD, going back through P&Z for approval. This 90/10 split can also be memorialized in this Resolution; however, doing so will not allow for a future change to such allocation between residential and commercial without either recreating the PID or dissolving the PID and creating a new PID with a different allocation over the same area, neither of which may be possible if development has already begun. City Staff and its consultants believe the 90/10 allocation that is memorialized in the PUD and Financing Agreement provide the City with sufficient structure to ensure development occurs as agreed at this time, while also allowing for a possible future ch

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. &nbsp; WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this&nbsp;item&nbsp;

While staff recognizes that the need to have a branch available within the City limits isn’t as significant now as it was in the past, having a branch in the City still offers the following benefits: The need to withdraw petty cash for change on utility bill transactions and police seizure operations; Continuity of operations during an emergency (manual processing of transactions, etc); Local economic support - encouragement of financial institutions a branch within City limits.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. &nbsp; WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this&nbsp;item&nbsp;

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item

BACKGROUND INFORMATION This item is included in the Strategic Plan under [INSERT NAME OF] Pillar and [INSERT NAME OF] Objective. This item is part of [INSERT NAME OF] Master Plan. This item is in alignment with current city ordinances. In the past 6 months, city council had related items during the [INSERT DATE(S) OF MEETINGS]. WHY? what does council already know about this particular item? what should they know? Think about strategic plan, master plans, budget, CIP, charter, ordinances, or previous council meetings (within last 12 months) related to this agenda item. start the framework of WHY? this item